Performances
RD Popularity Index
RD Growth Index
| 1h | 24h | 7d | 30d | 60d | 90d |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.25% | 8.95% | 10.44% | 69.21% | 112.37% | 12.98% |
Comparison
Top Holders
| Address | Token | Quantity | Percentage | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Merit Circle (bb43) |   BEAM | 8,265,671,452.08 | 14.14% | $25.27M |
| Binance 8 (acec) | BEAM | 7,368,988,978.78 | 12.6% | $22.53M |
| 0xdf6b...c69f | BEAM | 7,170,000,000 | 12.26% | $21.92M |
Open Markets
| # | Exchange | Pair | Price | +2% depth | -2% depth | Volume (24h) | volume % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HHTXCEX | BEAMX/USDT | $0.002852 | $742 | $2,573 | $990,871 | 9.88% |
| 2 | UUpbitCEX | BEAM/KRW | $0.002882 | $9,959 | $15,403 | $436,907 | 4.36% |
| 3 | BEAM/WETH | $0.002848 | $104,802 | $104,487 | $351,686 | 3.51% | |
| 4 | BBybitCEX | BEAM/USDT | $0.002857 | $8,711 | $18,733 | $312,474 | 3.12% |
| 5 | BEAM/USD | $0.002888 | $29,308 | $31,018 | $53,017 | 0.53% | |
| 6 | BBithumbCEX | BEAM/KRW | $0.002879 | $2,582 | $4,785 | $45,865 | 0.46% |
| 7 | BBitgetCEX | BEAM/USDT | $0.002876 | $43,471 | $34,201 | $35,585 | 0.35% |
| 8 | PPhemexCEX | BEAMX/USDT | $0.002861 | $5,505 | $3,164 | $21,363 | 0.21% |
| 9 | BEAM/WETH | $0.002872 | $624 | $622 | $9,623 | 0.10% | |
| 10 | BEAMX/USD | $0.00284 | $9,946 | $10,942 | $1,752 | 0.02% |
Follow Updates
Follow Lists
People
About Beam
Beam is a privacy-focused Layer 1 blockchain built on the Mimblewimble protocol, where all transactions are fully confidential by default—hiding sender, receiver, and amount. Its core business includes Confidential Assets (private tokens), a built-in DEX with atomic swaps (BTC, LTC, DOGE, etc.), private DeFi via WASM smart contracts, and payment channels for micropayments.
The market pain point Beam addresses is the inherent transparency of most blockchains, which exposes financial activity to public scrutiny. Beam solves this by making privacy the default, not an option, while maintaining scalability through Mimblewimble's cut-through technology. It also enables confidential DeFi—stablecoins, NFTs, AMMs—without sacrificing anonymity, which is rare in the industry.
In the past six months (2026-03-12 to 2026-09-12), Beam underwent its sixth hard fork in July 2026 (wallet v7.6), an emergency patch for a subtle vulnerability in its Bulletproofs rangeproof implementation, responsibly disclosed by MonclairTrades. The network also progressed toward BeamX DAO governance with on-chain voting, launched the Warp devnet 3, and continued developing the Hearty Hadron upgrade. A notable negative event was the Bulletproofs vulnerability itself, though it was patched before exploitation.
Beam launched its mainnet in January 2019, implementing the Mimblewimble protocol for default privacy. In June 2020, the first hard fork upgraded the PoW algorithm to BeamHash II, laying the foundation for subsequent evolution. In June 2021, the second hard fork enabled BeamHash III and activated Confidential Assets and the Lelantus privacy pool, expanding private transaction capabilities. In June 2022, the third hard fork introduced the Beam Virtual Machine (BVM), supporting WebAssembly smart contracts, transforming Beam into a privacy DeFi platform capable of deploying decentralized applications. In June 2026, a security hard fork fixed a Bulletproofs vulnerability and proposed a "lustration" process to verify supply integrity, reinforcing network trust. These milestones mark Beam's continuous evolution from a privacy coin to a programmable privacy ecosystem.
On June 13, 2026, a Bulletproofs rangeproof vulnerability was reported in Beam's core code—subtle but real, having passed multiple professional audits and AI reviews. Developers fixed it secretly and coordinated mining pools and exchanges to upgrade, completing a hard fork at block 3,928,666, reducing exploitation risk (negative event resolved/mitigated).
To verify supply integrity, the team proposed a "lustration" process: on first use, historical unspent outputs would disclose amount and asset type while hiding owners; nodes would track disclosed totals against known supply to prevent over-issuance. This trades one-time limited privacy disclosure for supply-integrity guarantees and requires another network upgrade. It raises privacy-versus-security trade-off discussions, potentially affecting adoption, price, and security.